<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New &amp; Improved Lulu Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lulu.com/blog/2008/05/28/a-new-improved-lulu-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lulu.com/blog/2008/05/28/a-new-improved-lulu-search-engine/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Self-Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giuseppe</title>
		<link>http://www.lulu.com/blog/2008/05/28/a-new-improved-lulu-search-engine/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Giuseppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulublog.com/2008/05/28/a-new-improved-lulu-search-engine/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know who to write, but I have important suggestions to give for the cd audio section of the site... if you have an address I can write to, please give me it... or if you can post them to someone of the creators, well, here they are.

I believe the audio cd part is a bit the Cinderella of Lulu, at the moment. So many things to improve! But bands and artists, and listeners also, are so exactingly!
A music cd is (more today than ever, as an object of choice in opposition to mp3!) a piece of art and should be perfect as the ones sold in shops!

Many things can, and should, be improved a lot.

1- Why don&#039;t you give the &quot;pro user&quot; the possibility to upload a premade iso file? So we could be sure our project is identical to the cd&#039;s we sell in shops? I refer to pauses between tracks, track names visible in certain cd players and important features one cannot manage just uploading the simple .wav files
For an example, My band&#039;s cd features a special cd-rom session and Lulu version won&#039;t!

2- Then, I suggest you to improve a lot the artwork part... why not letting us upload a full .pdf artwork for the booklet, instead of single parts? my artwork consists of two foldable pages, but I found I had to cut it into single faces. and I just can&#039;t imagine what could happen if my cd had a full 24-page booklet :-O You should try and give a look to what photobucket offers to its users, it&#039;s GREAT, just like a little online photoshop. And you should add to it a possibility to have a preview of the result (i.e. with a prospect of the plied side of the cd). Science fiction? Not for an important company like Lulu.

3- Last thing: you should offer alternatives to jewel cases, at least the widely used and beloved digipack...

I believe an important company like Lulu should always be one step ahead of people&#039;s expectation and I&#039;m sorry to say that&#039;s not the case with audio cds.
Giuseppe Iacobaci</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know who to write, but I have important suggestions to give for the cd audio section of the site&#8230; if you have an address I can write to, please give me it&#8230; or if you can post them to someone of the creators, well, here they are.</p>
<p>I believe the audio cd part is a bit the Cinderella of Lulu, at the moment. So many things to improve! But bands and artists, and listeners also, are so exactingly!<br />
A music cd is (more today than ever, as an object of choice in opposition to mp3!) a piece of art and should be perfect as the ones sold in shops!</p>
<p>Many things can, and should, be improved a lot.</p>
<p>1- Why don&#8217;t you give the &#8220;pro user&#8221; the possibility to upload a premade iso file? So we could be sure our project is identical to the cd&#8217;s we sell in shops? I refer to pauses between tracks, track names visible in certain cd players and important features one cannot manage just uploading the simple .wav files<br />
For an example, My band&#8217;s cd features a special cd-rom session and Lulu version won&#8217;t!</p>
<p>2- Then, I suggest you to improve a lot the artwork part&#8230; why not letting us upload a full .pdf artwork for the booklet, instead of single parts? my artwork consists of two foldable pages, but I found I had to cut it into single faces. and I just can&#8217;t imagine what could happen if my cd had a full 24-page booklet :-O You should try and give a look to what photobucket offers to its users, it&#8217;s GREAT, just like a little online photoshop. And you should add to it a possibility to have a preview of the result (i.e. with a prospect of the plied side of the cd). Science fiction? Not for an important company like Lulu.</p>
<p>3- Last thing: you should offer alternatives to jewel cases, at least the widely used and beloved digipack&#8230;</p>
<p>I believe an important company like Lulu should always be one step ahead of people&#8217;s expectation and I&#8217;m sorry to say that&#8217;s not the case with audio cds.<br />
Giuseppe Iacobaci</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

