Disputes over eBook pricing models… what do they all mean?

The eBook pricing war rages on, with such heavy-hitters as the Department of Justice, Amazon, Apple, and the majority of major publishers continuing to tussle over the price of eBooks.

To recap: Amazon has been selling eBooks at a loss for some time, in order to increase sales of their Kindle e-reader. Apple, looking to take some of the eBook business away from Amazon, then offered a higher pricing model to the major publishers, one which would keep them in business through the change of book formats. The Department of Justice, urged on by Amazon, filed suit against the major publishers claiming that they worked together to fix prices artificially high. The DOJ charged that this collusion is a breach of Federal Antitrust laws. After the suit was filed, a handful of publishers settled. Still, this is far from over.

The Consumer Federation of America, an association of nearly 300 nonprofit consumer groups, released a statement claiming that, “Books are being devalued, literature is not.”

By restoring¬†competitive¬†pricing to the market (a race to the bottom for eBook prices) the consumer obviously wins. But at what cost? Surely the major publishers cannot continue peddling a product they can’t make a profit off of.

The CFA outlined in their statement, “The competitive structure built on a cartel agency pricing model increased the price to consumers and the profits of colluding publishers and selected brick-and-mortar retailers. There are no indications that the book market performed better in the aggregate under the cartel agency model than it would have if the offending practices had not been present.”

In plain-speak: Apple’s supposed co-ordination of the major publishers drove up the price of eBooks and the profits of publishers and big stores like Barnes & Noble. Book sales were steady throughout, and were in no way affected by this practice. In essence, the practice works against the free market.

Once again, we’re brought back to a landscape of some pretty substantial market domination (Amazon), and the loss of the bedrock of American publishing, the big six publishers.

Still, when the music industry was collapsing a decade ago, many decried the end of music as we know it. And yet, music went on. Artists adapted, became their own labels, and today we see a vibrant music scene, dominated by independent artists and labels.

So what do you think? Would you rather see a race to the bottom on eBook pricing, or some stability in the market? Is the DOJ investigating the wrong companies? Should a company be able to sell a product at a loss when their competitors cannot?

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Although the FTC ruled in 1979 that Amway was not technically a pyramid scheme because there were no direct payments made for
    recruiting new sellers, Quixtar IBOs and Amway Sellers are given a higher
    percentage of sales when they recruit more people. Their explosive,
    value-packed, weekly webinar trainings show their relentless
    commitment and dedication to every members success. They
    weren’t forced to pay for these marketing materials or attend organizational meetings but
    were told that these “tools and functions” were necessary for their success in their
    organization.

One Trackback

  1. By The Same Result « On a Darkling Plain on July 7, 2012 at 11:38 pm

    [...] for my apparent laziness, here’s an article I found a while ago on the Lulu blog about eBook pricing models. ¬†Also, I’m considering doing book reviews to give this blog more substance, because as it [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*