Stephen King Publishes Joyland in Print-Only

One of the most financially successful authors in history, Stephen King, decided to make his new book, Joyland, available in print only.  Joyland, which is a throwback to the pulp novels of mid-century, will have to be read on a page rather than on a screen.

In a press release, King said, “I loved the paperbacks I grew up with as a kid, and for that reason, we’re going to hold off on e-publishing this one for the time being. Joyland will be coming out in paperback, and folks who want to read it will have to buy the actual book.”

By confirming his decision as an aesthetic one, King has made the decision that reading the book as an actual paperback is key to his vision. Authors often take liberties with presentation of their work, some maximizing experimentation, while others don’t even bother to have chapter breaks. But, by limiting the circulation of his book, King wishes to create an aura that he believes doesn’t come with an eBook. It’s not that King is a Luddite, either. He was one of the first authors to embrace eBooks when he released¬† Riding the Bullet, a digital-only novella, in 2000.

So what advantages are there to choosing one medium and not the other? If you’re looking to create a certain aesthetic to a work, like King, maybe a pulpy paperback is the only way to release your book. If your book is about the information age or utilizes a considerable amount of outside material and hyperlinks, then maybe an eBook is the only way to go. Still, it doesn’t necessarily help to wed yourself to one format. A lot of potential readers might not have made the jump to digital yet, and by only publishing an eBook, an author stands to alienate a sizable audience. Realistically though, the cost of publishing an eBook is much lower, and even large publishers are now taking the Print-On-Demand approach to publishing — only printing a physical book according to actual demand.

If King does decide to release Joyland digitally, it will be interesting to see if it is met with the same enthusiasm as his past works. But then again, if King truly believes that the format of the novel is essential to his vision, it might just stay an old-fashioned book.

What are your thoughts?

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

6 Comments

  1. He can do print only. It’s my favourite author I will alway buy his books in paper. I’ve bought just “Different Seasons” in e-book just after two paper edition: Italian and English.

  2. I applaud this. People need to get back again to actually holding the artform in their hands, turning pages with their fingers instead of a click. By candlelight, too! :D

  3. Morgan, Lulu

    Giovanni & Karen – I love the variety of feedback that our readers have on this topic. I’ve seen our authors’ comments on Facebook range from applause to condemnation. It makes me so happy to see our authors speaking up…whichever side they’re on. Thanks so much for commenting here.

  4. Hurray for you Stephen King. Every novel of yours that I have read has been in the print form. I think I will always love holding a book in my hand versus a machine.

  5. Bruce Bonafede

    To a book lover, it’s good to see King making this kind of statement. To me it’s like Beckett refusing to allow productions of his plays in ways he didn’t approve. It’s always inspiring to see an artist stick up for their work over their industry.

  6. Autumn

    I don’t think it’s a grand comment on physical books vs. e-books. I admire him for hewing to the vision of this particular novel. King has always been on the crest of whatever is going on in the publishing world.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*