I feel as if Barry Chamish is dillusional and perhaps sometimes diliberately deceptive. His sources are uncredible and usually nonexistant. Most of his "theories" appear to be baseless with little to no factual evidence. Don't take my word for it. Read his work and make your own conclusions. Some people are into this type of consipiracy theory stuff so who am I to judge, but look at the subject of that above positive review and I think we can all conclude who wrote it. . . ;)