I am enjoying the read, good theory, making sense to me, some things I have to research more, but good info :)





The worst thing about reading this book, is the spelling, grammatical, and other errors that I would not expect to find in a published book. MSWord would even pick up some of the errors. I am no expert on Language Arts, but I did graduate from High School thank you. LOL... not very hard to get 'point' right instead of 'pint', and '(' right instead of '9'.





Thanks for the theory David :) Would suggest a different person to type it up next time though :) or at least proof read it before sending it to print.





Peace.

I can honestly say that very few if any books have changed my thinking so dramatically as this one. I've appreciated Mr. Sereda's candor in responding to my email questions. Here is an excerpt:
Dear David,
Here's my frame of mind. Your concept of Singularity represents
and increase of Two Shock Levels for me. By this I mean the scalar reference to Future shock. Humans generally are only able to move up one
shock level at a time without any adverse reaction. The basic scale is represented by Shock Levels 0 to 4. I'm at about an SL2 and your Concept is an SL4 event.
I've had a teacher feeding me information and ideas that are generally only 1 level above me, and I've been okay with that so far. Then
he introduced me to your work, which instantly freaked me out. I would be like having that UFO you spoke about, land in your back yard then next
they come inside to sit down and chat with you about very advanced idea's.

So with that said, I'm stumbling forward, trying like mad to stay on my feet and not collapse into a heap of mental goo. What this was like for me is
similar to what you describe when confronting God. The blinding light of a thousand suns. My analogy is a bit different. Imagine if you will, driving
your car at night down a dimly lit freeway. You see the occasional and obvious signage along the roadway (standard information), punctuated by the blinding lights of oncoming
traffic (new ideas and concepts). But as you gaze to the left or right on your journey, there is pretty much darkness and vague outlines of whatever is there.
You know something is there, you just cannot see it. Now imagine, suddenly, that God light you spoke of, lighting up the landscape, which was previously
hidden from you. Now it is ALL visible in the blinding hot white light of the singularity!! Now just try keeping your car on that same road!

I'm seeing things I never knew even existed before. That is shocking in the extreme. Herein lays the road to madness or salvation. Right now I've just stopped
my car and I'm trying to process all this new information (new to me). Then I can decide which way to proceed. It will not be easy to acknowledge that I
may be on the wrong road altogether!

Now I do have one question, and this may stem from not fully understanding your intended meaning. It concerns your statement: "What is consciousness?"
If I follow your line of reasoning in that chapter, we created the universe through duality? I'm getting hung up on some of your analogies, like viewing the universe
through hubble shows us billions and billions of galaxies. But is that due to the fact we believe we will see something? The observers are creating
the world around them? So if I follow that thinking, and apply it to the middle ages, when man believed the world was "flat", then at that time it actually
was "flat"? I might be oversimplifying your explanations, but I'm caught in a bit of a casual loop."
....
I like this letter. Now, we are co-creating our limitation in this universe. We only see the dual aspects of it because the collective consciousness agrees to. The code on mass (atoms) prevents us from seeing our universe in real time. That means there "is" a universe in real time, but we are not experiencing it. When we get this, we realize this is an illusion only we are experiencing and we are trapped in it. The fact that we cannot experience the light of distant stars in real time shows us we are trapped in some fabric or matrix.

Hence, the Nag Hammadi Library, Acts of John, "They cast him down to the lowest region of all matter." That matter is our very fabric and matrix. We are in a spell.

ds

I found Singularity to be a Grand Marriage of Physics, and Metaphysics, seamlessly woven together with proven Scientific fact. Dave Reid, BioChemist, Statesville,NC

I'm glad I finally found out about you. I've been on a personal journey of awakening for a few years now. I've done this in fits and spurts, getting sucked down into the physical world of point consciousness. Recently I came to know one of your Mentor's. He has had a profound impact on my associative horizons and thus life, or meaning of life. So many unique or new idea's (new to me) all of which did not seem to share a common thread. His way of enlightening me was usually by metaphor or off the cuff statement. So when he asked me if I know the difference between Duality and Singularity, when we were chatting about the UFO concepts, I admitted my knowledge was cursory at best. He suggested I read your book Singularity. (which I'm still reading). But the more I looked into you and your path, the more I began to understand some of what he was trying to tell me. And also warn me..."most people cannot handle the truth". He is also prone to say such things as "The truth is stranger than fiction" and "Nothing is as it seems." I use these mantra's, if you will, to help me filter through the plethora of data on all these wide and varied, seemingly unrelated, subjects. Many subjects which you seem to have a much firmer grip upon.

I look forward to reading your book, Singularity, in addition to other works you've put out there. I applaud your fearless approach to stepping forward with what you know. You are much braver than most people that hold the keys to various pieces of this global puzzle. I can hardly wait till I grasp enough to step far enough back to see one of the bigger pictures of the puzzle.