This book explains everything in the physical universe in terms and equations a high-school student can understand. Any... More > physicist who reads it will fully understand what the universe is made of and every mechanism by which they interact. He will also understand where and why the present theories are totally defective despite the fact that their equations are experimentally correct. < Less

This book explains the mechanism of gravity, what electricity and magnetism and light and mass and heat and force and energy... More > are, what the quantum of action and of energy physically are, and how these things interact to form everything that exists in the universe. It does so in terms of human reason and sense evidence, coupled with experimental data. Any intelligent reader will understand this book, including its algebra and geometry. < Less

In his 1905 STR paper Einstein said, "a is a function phi(v) at present unknown"; which shows that he didn't know that... More > phi(v) denotes the ratio of lengths in the Y and Z axes rather than the ratio of rates of two systems. There is no symbol in his paper for the ratio of lengths in the axis of motion, so, by omission, its value is unity; which contradicts the LTE he tried and failed to derive. He wrote "c2 - v2" until he inserted Poincare's LTE with its expression, "1 - v2/c2", which he then used everywhere but once in the rest of his paper. This shows that he copied the LTE from Poincare's "Sur la Dynamique des l' Electron" while revising his proof copy. There are many other things that collectively prove that EINSTEIN DIDN'T UNDERSTAND the MATHEMATICAL or physical MEANINGS OF HIS OWN STR EQUATIONS and if you are a physicist NEITHER DO YOU. < Less

This book explains everything in the physical universe in terms and equations a high-school student can understand. Any... More > physicist who reads it will fully understand what the universe is made of and every mechanism by which they interact. He will also understand where and why the present theories are totally defective despite the fact that their equations are experimentally correct. < Less

This book explains the mechanism of gravity, what electricity and magnetism and light and mass and heat and force and energy... More > are, what the quantum of action and of energy physically are, and how these things interact to form everything that exists in the universe. It does so in terms of human reason and sense evidence, coupled with experimental data. Any intelligent reader will understand this book, including its algebra and geometry. < Less

This book critiques Einstein's 1905 paper that presented what is now called "The Special Theory of Relativity". It proves... More > that Einstein revised his paper at the last moment, and in the process made numerous mathematical errors. Toward the end of this book his initial paper (which was far better) is reconstructed. Although its math is fairly simple, a new reader is advised to read this book several times in order to fully understand its arguments.
The "flower", a simple equation, will radically revise quantum theory. < Less

This book explains everything in the physical universe in terms and equations a high-school student can understand. Any... More > physicist who reads it will fully understand what the universe is made of and every mechanism by which they interact. He will also understand where and why the present theories are totally defective despite the fact that their equations are experimentally correct. < Less

In his 1905 STR paper Einstein said, "a is a function phi(v) at present unknown"; which shows that he didn't know that... More > phi(v) denotes the ratio of lengths in the Y and Z axes rather than the ratio of rates of two systems. There is no symbol in his paper for the ratio of lengths in the axis of motion, so, by omission, its value is unity; which contradicts the LTE he tried and failed to derive. He wrote "c2 - v2" until he inserted Poincare's LTE with its expression, "1 - v2/c2", which he then used everywhere but once in the rest of his paper. This shows that he copied the LTE from Poincare's "Sur la Dynamique des l' Electron" while revising his proof copy. There are many other things that collectively prove that EINSTEIN DIDN'T UNDERSTAND the MATHEMATICAL or physical MEANINGS OF HIS OWN STR EQUATIONS and if you are a physicist NEITHER DO YOU. < Less