西方哲学史批判 Criticism of the History of Western Philosophy

《西方哲学史》很不妥当，实际上这是一部《西方思想史》，因为它包括了大量“非哲学的思想”题目，罗素一生并无任何一本文学著作，他是如何得到诺贝尔文学奖的呢？这印证了人间事物的本质就是“不靠谱”。列宁即使算是“二十世纪最伟大的人物”，但其实也和希特勒一样只有一个蛋。因为二十世纪恰巧是一个群魔乱舞的“新社会”，而罗素偏偏喜欢扯蛋，所以才拿到了诺贝尔文学奖。 Synopsis: "History of Western Philosophy" is very inappropriate. In fact, this is a "History of Western Thought" because it includes a large number of "non-philosophical thought" topics. Russell did not have any literary works in his life. How did he get the Nobel Prize? What about the literary award? This confirms that the essence of human affairs is "unreliable." Even though Lenin is considered "the greatest man of the 20th century," he actually has only one egg like Hitler. Because the twentieth century happened to be a "new society" in which demons danced wildly, and Russell liked to bullshit, he won the Nobel Prize in Literature.