THESE

The world's current history is a version cobbled together from fragments of real history while building the global corporation named the Roman Catholic Church (Ecclesia Catholica Romana). The foundation of that version, built by the end of the 16th century to ensure the success of this religious institution in its international expansion, was based on three lies, three fakes invented by the ideologists of Catholicism:   ANTIQUITY OF CHRISTIANITY THE ROMAN EMPIRE THE JEWISH PEOPLE   As a result of implanting these simulacrums into people’s minds, the real process of civilizing Europe, and, to be precise, the entire Western world, was carefully covered up. Striving to restore the true picture of what happened, the author argues that, in accordance with the concept of the continuity of civilizations, everything humanity uses today—basic principles of government, foundations of law, systems of economic and social relations, beliefs, traditions, writing, mathematics, literature—are the fruits of the Sumerian-Akkadian-Romeo-Judeo civilizations. The author returns to this chain the links carefully obscured in the Catholic version of history—the Romeo and Judeo civilizations and believes that the current civilization of the world was carried out by the social class of Romea, composed of individuals involved in finance and management both in the metropolis and its military-trading companies, which operated throughout the known world before the beginning of our millennium. Representatives of this class were designated in the Romean language—Aramaic—which was the primary language of communication (lingua franca) in the vastness of the Ecumene by the social term "Jude" in variations: שדא/שידע/שדעה/שעד/שדד/שֵׁד/שייד/יודא/ייד (sheda, sheyeda, shedea, sheed, shed, shad, shed, shyid, yude, yid). Consequently, under prevailing historical circumstances, the current heir of the Sumerian-Akkadian-Romeo civilizations is entitled to be called the Judeo civilization. Furthermore, the author asserts that this civilization, akin to its predecessors, lacks ethnic denotation and is essentially a purely social construct. Instead of the generally accepted etymological interpretations of some terms and toponyms, which are not well-founded, in the author’s opinion, he offers new ones. Including: Jude (Jüde, Jude, judío, giudeo, le Juif, jahūdī, ǰuhūd, džihüd, etc.), chavrey, Hevre-Hebre-Habiru, Hebrew, haram/hram, ghetto, Yerushalayim/Jerusalem, Vatican, Avignon, Crimea, Paris, Spain,