At the center of this book is a question that many practitioners quietly face but few are trained to answer well: when a client reports a vision, a vivid dream, or a spiritually significant inner event, how should that experience be understood? Is it a symptom of a psychiatric or neurological condition? A symbolic expression of unresolved trauma or unconscious conflict? A culturally meaningful idiom of distress? A genuine spiritual emergence or vocational summons? Too often, the available frameworks force an artificial choice between reductionism and uncritical spiritualization. This book argues that such a choice is inadequate. Human experience is more layered than our professional categories sometimes allow, and safe, ethical care requires the capacity to think across biological, psychological, social, technological, cultural, and spiritual dimensions at once.