I think a lot about what the internet would be like if it profited everyone who created it. We, after all, create all of the social media posts and publish all of the web pages. And yet platforms have inserted themselves into the transaction and now earn much more as a deliverer of content, than we do as creators of that content. Without the photos we post, Instagram wouldn’t have anything to put in our feeds. Without the web pages we make, Google wouldn’t have anything to point to. Without all of the information we put on the internet, OpenAI wouldn’t be able to answer a single question. We create the labor these platforms earn money from. Why shouldn’t those platforms pay for that labor? When we compare the internet to the brick-and-mortar world, the difference becomes particularly stark. As Glen Weyl points out in Radical Markets, “The share of income going to labor in the largest tech companies is roughly 5-15%,” Weyl says. “Dramatically lower than service-sector companies like Walmart, where labor’s share is roughly 80%.” “Facebook, for example, pays out only about 1% of its value each year to workers (programmers) because it gets the rest of its work for free from us! In contrast, Walmart pays out 40% of its value in wages.” Translation: Tech companies use all of us who create the internet as free labor. Then they profit. Our latest digital and print pamphlet is designed to think through an alternative internet. One that benefits everyone who lives on it every day. New_ Public serves as this project’s patron, supporting our design and print costs, with head of editorial, Josh Kramer, writing our foreword. The cover illustration is designed by Nina Bunjevac with the print and digital editions designed by Patricia Faggi. We are joined by eight thinkers, each re-imagining a better internet through 10 essays